Publications


OpenADMET generates open ADMET data and structures, and its datasets and blind challenges are being used across the community to benchmark new models, test validation strategies, and study ADMET and potency prediction. This page lists OpenADMET's own publications, followed by the papers we know about that use OpenADMET data, grouped by dataset. If your paper uses OpenADMET data and isn't listed, let us know.

As of October 2026, this page lists 33 publications:

  • 3 OpenADMET overview and perspective papers
  • 1 structural biology paper from OpenADMET
  • 29 papers that use OpenADMET datasets: 3 challenge overview papers from the organizers and 26 from the wider community

Some papers use more than one dataset and appear in more than one dataset section below.

Featured Preprint
December 2025 · Preprints

OpenADMET: Embracing the Avoid-Ome to Transform Drug Discovery

Fraser, J. S.; Edgar, S.; Handly, L. N.; Kosuri, S.; Chodera, J. D.; Murcko, M.; Walters, W. P. A preprint introducing OpenADMET and the Avoid-Ome framework for transforming drug discovery through open science.

Read More →

OpenADMET overviews


Perspectives on the motivation for OpenADMET, the "avoidome," and the role of blind challenges.

Publication
Blind challenges let us see the path forward for predictive models
Chodera, Walters, Kosuri, Fraser
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2026, 66(4), 1947–1949
Perspective on why blind challenges are essential for evaluating predictive models
View Publication
Preprint
OpenADMET: embracing the avoid-ome to transform drug discovery
Fraser, Edgar, Handly, Kosuri, Chodera, Murcko, Walters
Preprints.org, Dec 2025
The case for OpenADMET and open data on the avoid-ome
View Preprint
Publication
Structure is beauty, but not always truth
Fraser, Murcko
Cell 2024, 187(3), 517–520
Commentary introducing the challenge of drug interactions with “anti-targets” (the avoidome)
View Publication

Structural biology


Preprint
Structural plasticity and ligand promiscuity of CYP3A4 revealed by cryo-EM
Orta, Schäfer, Correy et al.
bioRxiv, Sep 2026
Cryo-EM structures of the avoidome target CYP3A4
View Preprint

Challenge overview papers


Papers written by the challenge organizers, summarizing results and lessons learned.

Preprint
Assessing the state of the art in ADMET prediction: lessons from the OpenADMET-ExpansionRx community blind challenge
Castellanos, MacDermott-Opeskin, Ainsley et al.
ChemRxiv, Sep 2026
Dataset: ExpansionRx
Organizer results paper
View Preprint
Preprint
Operational insights from the front lines of OpenADMET: lessons from our blind challenges
MacDermott-Opeskin, Castellanos, Swain et al.
ChemRxiv, Sep 2026
Dataset: All four challenges
Perspective on running the challenges; open-sources the challenge infrastructure
View Preprint
Publication
A computational community blind challenge on pan-coronavirus drug discovery data
MacDermott-Opeskin, Scheen, Wognum et al.
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2026, 66(6), 3129–3149
Dataset: ASAP-Polaris-OpenADMET
Organizer paper: pose, potency, and ADMET subchallenge results
View Publication

ASAP-Polaris-OpenADMET antiviral data (2025)


Preprint
Mol-JEPA: a multimodal joint embedding predictive architecture for molecules
Rottach, Schieferdecker et al. (Boehringer Ingelheim)
arXiv, Sep 2026
Data used: ADMET + potency (7 endpoints)
Benchmark for a pretrained foundation model, using cluster and official splits
View Preprint
Preprint
GRASP: graph representation learning with assay supervision for molecular properties
Srivastava, Gorantla, Chundru, Singh, Mey, Singh
bioRxiv, Oct 2026
Data used: Potency + ADMET
Benchmark
View Preprint
Preprint
Benchmarking uncertainty and improving risk ranking in multi-task bioactivity prediction
Wang, Tian, Che
bioRxiv, Sep 2026
Data used: Potency + ADMET
Benchmark for multi-task uncertainty estimation
View Preprint
Publication
Benchmarking experiments with external data, domain-specific features, and learning strategies for modeling ADME and potency of coronavirus main protease inhibitors
Titus, Palaniappan
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2026, 66(19), 12549–12567
Preprint: ChemRxiv, Sep 2025 (Srilakshmi, Titus, Palaniappan)
Data used: ADMET + potency
Participant: XGBoost on a bespoke 55-descriptor feature space with public-data augmentation; factorial benchmarking of features and learning strategies
View Publication
Preprint
BoltzMol-1: towards reliable virtual screening for fast and cost-effective hit discovery
Getz, Smith, Colgan et al.
bioRxiv, Jul 2026
Data used: ADMET + potency
Benchmark
View Preprint
Preprint
Surrogate machine learning models for ADME prediction: from synthetic labels to experimental data
Peteani, Parrondo-Pizarro, Gerebtzoff, Rodríguez-Pérez
ChemRxiv, Jun 2026
Data used: ADME
Exploring surrogate training strategies
View Preprint
Publication
ASTRA: statistically robust model selection from cross-validation
Treyde, Duarte
ICLR 2026
Data used: ADMET + potency
Real-world test case for a cross-validation model-selection method based on statistical hypothesis testing
View Publication
Preprint
XIMP: cross graph inter-message passing for molecular property prediction
Ehrlich, Kummer, Voracek, Bause, Kriege
arXiv, Jan 2026
Data used: ADMET (5) + potency (2)
Benchmark for a new GNN architecture, alongside MoleculeNet
View Preprint
Preprint
Machine-learning methods for pH-dependent aqueous-solubility prediction
Mann, Wagen
ChemRxiv, Jan 2026
Data used: Kinetic solubility
Benchmark
View Preprint
Publication
Improved ADME prediction by multitask pretraining on predicted data: insights from the ASAP-Polaris-OpenADMET blind challenge
Pham, Le, Thai
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2026, 66(1), 395–405
Data used: ADMET
Participant (4th on aggregated MAE); pretraining on industry-released predicted labels
View Publication
Publication
A comparative study of deep learning and classical modeling approaches for protein–ligand binding pose and affinity prediction in coronavirus main proteases
Liu, Tang, Niu, Wang
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2026, 66(1), 731–743
Data used: Ligand poses + potency
Retrospective comparison; AlphaFold3 performed best on poses
View Publication
Publication
Deep learning vs classical methods in potency and ADME prediction: insights from a computational blind challenge
Fischer, Southiratn, Triki, Cedeno
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2025, 65(24), 13115–13131
Data used: ADMET + potency
Participant (1st on SARS-CoV-2 pIC50); retrospective statistical comparison of deep learning vs classical methods
View Publication
Publication
Fingerprint-based machine learning for SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV Mpro inhibition: highlighting the potential of Bayesian neural networks
Doering, Talagayev, Liu, Wolber
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2025, 65(24), 13255–13265
Data used: Potency
Participant: fingerprint-based models, including Bayesian neural networks
View Publication
Publication
Polaris challenge: data-driven priors to improve docking for pose prediction
Sun, Wang, Purnomo, Head-Gordon
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2025, 65(21), 12058–12067
Data used: Ligand poses
Participant: Vina-GPU docking with fragment priors, >50% of poses under 2 Å
View Publication
Publication
Deep-learning vs physics-based docking tools for future coronavirus pandemics
Ma, Chen
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2025, 65(21), 12006–12013
Data used: Ligand poses
Participant: comparison of deep-learning and physics-based docking
View Publication
Publication
TEMPL: a template-based protein–ligand pose prediction baseline
Fülöp, Šícho, Dehaen
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2025, 65(20), 11149–11157
Data used: Ligand poses
Participant: template baseline, 51% (intermediate) / 34% (final) of poses under 2 Å
View Publication
Publication
Robust prediction of protein–ligand binding potency with multi-modal customized gate control
Xu, Tang, Muhammad, Yin, Liu, Sun
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2025, 65(19), 10465–10476
Data used: Potency
Participant: multi-modal potency prediction
View Publication
Preprint
Superior molecular representations from intermediate encoder layers
Pinto
arXiv, 2025 (AI4Mat-NeurIPS 2025 workshop)
Data used: Potency + ADMET
Benchmark
View Preprint

OpenADMET-ExpansionRx data (2025–26)


Preprint
Human intestinal absorption revisited: the 1998 descriptors survive, and the method extends to permeability
Muskal, Wessel
bioRxiv, Oct 2026
Data used: Caco-2 permeability (Papp A→B), 3,771 compounds
One of four datasets for a genetic-algorithm descriptor selection and random forest workflow; extends the method to small-molecule permeability. Models served at predicthia.ai
View Preprint
Preprint
GRASP: graph representation learning with assay supervision for molecular properties
Srivastava, Gorantla, Chundru, Singh, Mey, Singh
bioRxiv, Oct 2026
Data used: All 9 endpoints, challenge temporal split
Benchmark
View Preprint
Preprint
Evaluating autonomous LLM agents across molecular prediction and optimization benchmarks
Smbatyan, Ghukasyan, Petrosyan
bioRxiv, Oct 2026
Data used: OpenADMET-ExpansionRx and PXR datasets
Evaluating agentic workflows
View Preprint
Technical post
Beacon-2: completing the reward function for chemical optimization in drug discovery
Rich (Inductive Bio)
Inductive Bio technical post, Sep 2026
Data used: All 9 endpoints, challenge temporal split
Benchmark for their human dose prediction methodology
View Post
Preprint
MolLedger: an additive graph neural network with chemically grounded ADME attributions
Ji (Hamilton College)
arXiv, Sep 2026
Data used: All 9 endpoints (7,608 molecules), merged with Lipophilicity, TDC, and ESOL, then scaffold split
Primary training and benchmark data for an additive GNN with per-atom attributions. Accuracy matches a pooled GNN (LogD MAE 0.40); attributions are evaluated on matched pairs
View Preprint
Preprint
Mol-JEPA: a multimodal joint embedding predictive architecture for molecules
Rottach, Schieferdecker et al. (Boehringer Ingelheim)
arXiv, Sep 2026
Data used: All 9 endpoints
Benchmark with cluster splits and the official temporal split (also evaluated on ASAP and PXR data)
View Preprint
Preprint
Model validation protocols for machine learning in small molecule drug discovery
Seal, Zalte, … Ainsley, Ledeboer, Green, Bender, Wognum
bioRxiv, Aug 2026
Data used: All 9 endpoints, challenge temporal split
Main case study for a five-recommendation validation framework
View Preprint
Preprint
BoltzMol-1: towards reliable virtual screening for fast and cost-effective hit discovery
Getz, Smith, Colgan et al.
bioRxiv, Jul 2026
Data used: All 9 endpoints, challenge temporal split
Benchmark
View Preprint
Preprint
Probabilistic contrastive pretraining for multi-task ADME property prediction
Xue, Veccham, Paliwal, Shimko, Livne (NVIDIA)
arXiv, Jun 2026
Data used: All 9 endpoints, challenge temporal split
Downstream benchmark for Contrastive KERMT
View Preprint
Preprint
QuADMET-Former: pre-training on quantum mechanical properties improves ADMET prediction
Raja, Zhao, Tyrchan, Nittinger, Bronstein, Deane, Morris (Oxford / AstraZeneca)
ChemRxiv, May 2026
Data used: All 9 endpoints, re-split with spectral splits
Part of a 23-dataset benchmark (with TDC and Biogen ADME) for quantum-mechanics-pretrained equivariant transformers; best or near-best MAE on 7 of 9 OpenADMET tasks
View Preprint

PXR challenge data (2026)


Preprint
Evaluating autonomous LLM agents across molecular prediction and optimization benchmarks
Smbatyan, Ghukasyan, Petrosyan
bioRxiv, Oct 2026
Data used: OpenADMET-ExpansionRx and PXR datasets
Evaluating agentic workflows
View Preprint
Preprint
Predicting CYP450 induction and PXR activation with machine learning approaches: challenges and opportunities
Orsi, Thieme, Gätzner et al. (Roche / Genentech / Univ. Vienna)
ChemRxiv, Sep 2026
Data used: Single-concentration screen, 10,870 compounds (2-fold threshold, 25% positive)
Public counterpart to Roche internal PXR and CYP induction data
View Preprint
Preprint
Mol-JEPA: a multimodal joint embedding predictive architecture for molecules
Rottach, Schieferdecker et al. (Boehringer Ingelheim)
arXiv, Sep 2026
Data used: pEC50 activity, ~4,300 compounds
Benchmark on cluster splits and the official challenge split
View Preprint